• IDRA

The Right Drone for Construction Sites

- Brady Reisch | Commercial UAV News


construction, drones, drone, uas, uav, suas, commercial drone, drone technology
Commercial UAV News

Unmanned Aircraft (UA/Drones) have rapidly become a significant component of the modern construction industry workflow whether it’s for progress reporting, site planning, BIM, inventory control, safety awareness, structure inspection, topo’s, or other purposes. Site supervisors, architects, and stakeholders all benefit from the rapid output of accurate 2D/Ortho, or 3D models that may be used for purposes ranging from simple visualizations, progress reporting, stockpile calculations, DSM, contours, to more complex overlaying blue-prints in the As-Designed/As-Built or BIM process.


Choosing the right aerial asset/UA may be challenging, particularly as the marketing of many UA is focused on RTK built in (rarely accurate) PPK solutions and a many component workflow versus others that are single-step workflows. Decisions on aircraft choices will be made based on budget, accuracy requirements, speed to result, and overall reporting requirements.


On any site flown for BIM, input to AutoDesk or similar tools, having accurate ground control points (GCP) is required. GCP’s may be obtained from the site surveyor, county plat, or other official sources, and this is often the best method assuming that the ground control points may be identified via UA flight-captured images. Site supervisors may also capture their own points using common survey tools. Devices such as the DTResearch 301 RTK tablet may be used to augment accuracy, combining GPC location points from the air and on the ground. Failing these methods, site supervisors can capture their own points based on the specific needs of the site. These points may be calculated via traditional rover/base RTK systems, or using PPK, RTK, or PPP solutions, again being budget and time dependent. If centimeter (vs decimeter) accuracy is required, RTK or PPK are necessary.


Putting accuracy aside, image quality is gaining importance as stakeholders have become accustomed to photo-grade ortho or models. Oftentimes, these models are used to share growth with inspectors as well, which means having presentation-grade images may be critical. Image quality is high priority when generating pre-development topos, or simply illustrating a tract of land from all directions. In other words, a high-quality imaging sensor (camera) is a necessity. Some aircraft allow user-choice cameras, while many UA manufacturers are creating cameras specific to their aircraft design.


Turning to aircraft, we chose three popular aircraft for the comparisons:


Flying the site several times in various conditions, the same RTK capture points are used in all three mapping projects. The DTResearch 301 RTK system is used to capture GCP on-location, with Hoodman GCP kit as the on-ground GCP. The Hoodman SkyRuler system was also captured as a scale-constraint checkpoint.

construction, drones, drone, uas, uav, suas, commercial drone, drone technology
Commercial UAV News

This commercial site is small in size (1.64 acres), and one we were able to begin capturing prior to forms being laid, all the way to vertical installation.


Accuracy varied greatly with each aircraft system, particularly in elevation calculations. Deviations are from projected points vs the GCP points obtained through a surveyor’s RTK system.

Overall (and to our surprise), the Autel EVO was most accurate with a deviation of:

  • x-5.112ft

  • y-47.827ft

  • z-16.541ft

The Yuneec H520/E90 combo was not far behind with a deviation of:

  • X-10.323ft

  • y-44.225ft

  • z-92.788ft

Finally, the DJI Phantom 4 presented deviations of:

  • x-1.95ft

  • y-45.565ft

  • z-140.626ft


All of these deviations are calculated and compensated for in Pix4DMapper, which is used to assemble all of these week-to-week projects.

As 3D modelling was part of the comparison/goal, obliques were flown in addition to nadir captures. While manual settings are often essential for high quality maps and models, in the following images cameras were all set to automatic exposure, shutter, ISO.

construction, drones, drone, uas, uav, suas, commercial drone, drone technology
AUTEL EVO (Original version)

construction, drones, drone, uas, uav, suas, commercial drone, drone technology
YUNEEC H520/E90

construction, drones, drone, uas, uav, suas, commercial drone, drone technology
PHANTOM 4 PRO

All aircraft models work well with Pix4DMapper, although at the time of this writing, Pix4D has not created lens profiles for the Autel EVO (they have indicated this feature should be available “soon”). We custom-sized the lens profile ourselves, based on information provided by Autel’s product managers.


Ortho’s

construction, drones, drone, uas, uav, suas, commercial drone, drone technology
AUTEL EVO

construction, drones, drone, uas, uav, suas, commercial drone, drone technology
YUNEEC H520/E90

construction, drones, drone, uas, uav, suas, commercial drone, drone technology